If one could read a book and imagine or imagine before the book was wrote why would one cost the land its trees, or if one could envision a game before the game was envisioned why would one create a world not real to perception but reeal to living eyes, What if ones ancient truth was dreaming the world as it was or is or as it could be and you were a human fish with a spear would you still need the book or the computer and which would you choose
Books, Computers, or Ancient Truth
- Status
stealth toilet
Moderator
:lolStrubes said:
I'm not sure if I understand this one, but...
A computer is really nothing more than a very efficient book. It's all just methods of storing, searching, and relaying information. But I have no idea if that's what you're getting at. :lol
F
fhqwhgads
Lurker
Stop trying to be deep, you utterly fail at it.
Mai Valentine
Moderator
Books are made because telling stories vocally would take too much time. Seriously. With books, great stories can reach a much wider audience.
Yes it's true that trees are cut down to make paper, and why have paper when you can put everything on a computer, and so forth. But books are a lot more affordable than computers, and there's other ways to help save the trees if you're an environmentalist. Recycling newspapers, cardboard, etc.
Yes it's true that trees are cut down to make paper, and why have paper when you can put everything on a computer, and so forth. But books are a lot more affordable than computers, and there's other ways to help save the trees if you're an environmentalist. Recycling newspapers, cardboard, etc.
Hell Scyth
Rock Hard, Dead or Alive
This is some really deep thiking stuff you have put forth, Diajin.
Okay, so, lemme' just put how i interpreteted it.
"If books could be made witout the need of one be written, then there'ed be no record for others, if a game could be envisioned before the real perception of the real world was made, then there'd by no uderstanding on life, and if the dreaming was of whatever it could be, then there'd be no need for us to think of being the human fish with the spear and having to decide whether to use the book or the computer."
Okay, so, lemme' just put how i interpreteted it.
"If books could be made witout the need of one be written, then there'ed be no record for others, if a game could be envisioned before the real perception of the real world was made, then there'd by no uderstanding on life, and if the dreaming was of whatever it could be, then there'd be no need for us to think of being the human fish with the spear and having to decide whether to use the book or the computer."
F
fhqwhgads
Lurker
Not even the quote box could hold the sheer volume of that...word!Dart said:
And Mai, your paper argument is actually pointless. Since we made computers and printers and stuff, we've used three times as much paper than before.
- Status