CoD or BF?

I keep seeing a lot of comparisons between the Call of Duty series and the Battlefield series. CoD is definitely the unchallenged champion of military fps, but I personally like the Battlefield games a lot better. I'm still playing BF3 more than a year after release and I think I played BOpsII for like a week. CoD definitely does campaign mode better, but Battlefield has the better multiplayer. BF3 also has some amazing graphics and the destructible terrain is pretty entertaining by itself.

What does everyone else think?
 
I agree with you. Although I haven't played either for over a year now, I ended up preferring the BF series.

Mostly because it has vehicles, more maps with lots of natural terrain and is not as much as a run-n-gun game as CoD. Also, the Frostbite engine is pretty sweet.
 
BF3 all the way.

Every Cod game sucked after 2 except Blops ,IMO.
Count out Blops 2 though cause its the only one I haven't at least tried somewhere.
 
I was playing some Bf3 earlier, and I was up top a building and a guy used a grenade launcher to blow out the wall and parachute in to try to kill me. It didn't work cause he had to switch and I shot him first, but stuff like that...

That was ingenious.
 
CreepinDeth said:
How could I forget destructible maps?! Adds so much more to the game as demonstrated by mariorulezman.

Nothing like blow up out the bottom of a building and watching it collapse with a bunch of your enemy inside.
 
Back
Top