Help give the maximum penalty for the men who tortured and mutilated a puppy

Dark-Abyss

Left 4 Dead Rulez!!!! <3 AnnaSophia Robb <3
Horrifying dog torture video shocks police
Bruce Mckean Of The Mackay Mercury
22nd October 2008

HARDENED police officers have been shocked by the horrifying torture, mutilation and brutal slaying of a seven-month-old fox terrier puppy near Mackay at the weekend.

Two men, charged with the brutal killing, entered no pleas when they fronted a Mackay court yesterday.
They are due in court again today.
If found guilty, they could face up to two years in prison.

The incident is alleged to have happened in the mining community of Moranbah, west of the central Queensland city.
Police have obtained video footage from a mobile phone which shows graphic images of the puppy yelping and howling in terrible pain as it hacked to pieces.
Animal rights experts have described the case as one of the worst and most horrific in Australian history.

Police will allege that a pair of garden shears and a pocket knife were used to torture and kill the little puppy.
Moranbah police said the dog was a family pet.
They said the owners were too distressed to talk to anyone about it.

The dog's nose was cut off, its front right leg and rear left leg were cut off and it was decapitated.
Police will say the dog was stolen from a residence in Railway Parade in Moranbah and was taken to a lookout in the town.
Congealed blood and dog hairs were found on picnic tables at the lookout.

A three-part video series on a mobile phone shows the dog being tortured.
The final stages of the video show the dog's mutilated body parts.

The dog's body was found about 3.50am on Monday near the town's campdraft ground.
It was dumped beside a road.
It is believed that a car crashed into a fence at the campdraft grounds and police were checking if anyone was injured when they discovered the dog's body.
After seizing the mobile phone, police recovered a set of garden shears which had dog hair and blood on them.
Police also took possession of the clothes worn by two men in the car, for scientific testing.

"Senior police officers were visibly shaken after viewing the footage. Police and the RSPCA say that if the allegations are true, this could well be the worst case of animal cruelty ever brought before the courts in Australia," RSPCA's Queensland Chief Inspector Michael Pecic said.
"This is very, very disturbing," Mr Pecic said.
"For legal reasons this is really all I can say at the moment. But when you talk to senior police officers who have seen a lot of carnage in their time and they say it shocked even them, then you begin to get the picture."
Footage from the attack has been suppressed by police until the outcome of the court case.

The maximum penalty under the Animal Care and Protection Act for such an offence is $75,000 or two years in jail; however the maximum penalty ever handed out has been a four month jail term.
Recent incidences of senseless animal cruelty have staggered even the RSPCA, with cases increasing in prevalence and severity.
The two men, aged 20 and 24 were charged in the Mackay Magistrate's Court with stealing a dog, wilfully and unlawfully killing it, wilfully damaging a gate, and unlawful possession of marijuana, all at Moranbah on Monday.

Please sign this petition and pass it on to anyone and everyone you can so we can help to see these monsters get the maximum sentence possible for what they did to Peanut. It will be presented to the court before the hearing on November 17 2008. The goal is for a hundred thousand signatures.

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/maximum-penalty-for-the-men-who-hacked-up-a-puppy
 
Oh god. That's just...too gruesome. I don't usually get squeasy at bloody things but hearing this....my god. That's cruel. :(
 
Due process. How would you like it if someone started an online petition to have you thrown in jail for a hundred years? It just doesn't work this way.

"Innocent untill proven guilty" means they will be tried by an impartial judge on front of an impartial jury. They will be found guilty or not guilty based on evidence at hand, and not emotion. their sentence will be handed down based on the severity of the crime, and not the mindless rhetoric of people signing an online petition.

It's unfortunate that they did this. It's even more unfortunate that people are willing to toss out due process and go stright to sentencing.
 
Dart said:
It's unfortunate that they did this. It's even more unfortunate that people are willing to toss out due process and go stright to sentencing.
These people aren't suggesting that this guy shouldn't get a trial. They are saying that if he is convicted (if he has not already been convicted), he should get the maximum sentence. I assume the final decision is up to the judge, but these people are trying to influence the judge, I guess. This is an online petition, created so that people can voice their opinion on the issue, not a lynch mob that plans to circumvent the justice system.
 
Homicidal Cherry53 said:
These people aren't suggesting that this guy shouldn't get a trial. They are saying that if he is convicted (if he has not already been convicted), he should get the maximum sentence. I assume the final decision is up to the judge, but these people are trying to influence the judge, I guess. This is an online petition, created so that people can voice their opinion on the issue, not a lynch mob that plans to circumvent the justice system.

Influencing a judge can lead the defense to call for a misstrial. And this would be a giant step backwards for the people who want these defendants to "burn at the stake." The best thing to do is to let the judge and jury do their jobs in bringing about a conviction. Sometimes the best way (and safest) to influence someone is to just stay out of the way.
 
Dart said:
Influencing a judge can lead the defense to call for a misstrial. And this would be a giant step backwards for the people who want these defendants to "burn at the stake." The best thing to do is to let the judge and jury do their jobs in bringing about a conviction. Sometimes the best way (and safest) to influence someone is to just stay out of the way.
I agree with you in many ways here, but in controversial cases, the public voices their opinions and there is no mistrial. Now, it is highly unlikely that they influenced the judge in the slightest (if they did, then we do a poor job of selecting judges), but there certainly wasn't anything wrong with the public outcry.

My first reply may have come off as a bit hostile, and I apologize for that, but this is still just an innocent online petition. It is merely a place for people to express their disgust for the crime and hope that the guy gets the harshest sentence possible.
 
Dart said:
Influencing a judge can lead the defense to call for a misstrial. And this would be a giant step backwards for the people who want these defendants to "burn at the stake." The best thing to do is to let the judge and jury do their jobs in bringing about a conviction. Sometimes the best way (and safest) to influence someone is to just stay out of the way.

Normally I would agree with you but the fact that there is video displaying the crime kind of makes the possibility of a misstrial occurring low.
 
They say..."Two Wrongs Don't Make A Right" not in this case man.It's not a very christian thing to say,and God please forgive me,by all things holy if I had my way,and I mean this with every fiber of my being,I would place these monsters inside a cage with four very rabid Pit Bulls.I wouldn't care less if those men were ripped to shreds so they would feel,even for a brief period the pain and suffering that poor animal was put through.
 
CreepinDeth said:
Normally I would agree with you but the fact that there is video displaying the crime kind of makes the possibility of a misstrial occurring low.

I realize this. The evidence will speak for it's self, and no influence would be needed. This is my point. There will be no need for people to stand there with picthforks and torches in one hand, and a petition demanding for anything short of beheading. The judge presiding will likely do this on his or her own.

My first reply may have come off as a bit hostile, and I apologize for that, but this is still just an innocent online petition. It is merely a place for people to express their disgust for the crime and hope that the guy gets the harshest sentence possible.

I didn't take it as hostile. My friends say I am too logical for my own good. So no harm, no foul. :D
 
Back
Top