Fr0dus Maximus said:
Just put this way. A person that is more physically fit will have the faster reflexes and better mind set than one which is not.
I don't know where you're getting that idea from. I used to be friends with a hockey goalie who was good at his position because he had incredible reflexes. He was a lot, shall we say,
rounder than I was, but still a better goalie by far. However, once he stacked up against other goalies who were in better shape, he was not quite as good as them because he could not move his whole body as fast as they could. Being out of shape only hindered him because he needed to move his whole body. With video games, all you have to move is your fingers, and you get better at doing that by
moving your fingers. Not by jogging and lifting weights.
Homicidal Cherry53 said:
Tell me, what kind of shape was Babe Ruth in? Do you not consider him an athlete because he was in bad shape?
Babe Ruth relied heavily on his innate talent for the game, but once again, nobody's that good unless they practice for years and years. Babe Ruth didn't practice running the bases because he figured it was easier to just hit the ball out of the park and walk'em. I don't know if you've ever tried to hit a ball 390 yards before, but let me tell you, no couch potato is going to be able to do that. Training upper body strength, and practicing the batting motion (putting the weight of your whole body behind the ball) is an exercise that is very taxing on your body. Just because an athlete has not trained their whole body to do everything well (ever see a marathon runner enter a dead lift competition?) it doesn't mean their bodies are not trained to perform one physical feat well.
And once again, I don't consider finger dexterity a physical feat. Or conceding that, I don't consider it an athletic one.