1. Pokemon
2. Smash Brothers
3. Animal Crossing
4. Zelda
5. Mario
2. Smash Brothers
3. Animal Crossing
4. Zelda
5. Mario
Completely forgot Advance Wars. >_>FrakAttack said:3. Advance/Famicom Wars
*gasps* Yes.Fr0dus Maximus said:1) Kid Icarus
Um...no.Strubes said:I thought 3 or more was a franchise.
How wouldn't it be good, the original remains one of the best platformers to date.I think if they make a sequel...I just don't see it as a good platformer..but to each their own.
fhqwhgads said:Um...no.
How wouldn't it be good, the original remains one of the best platformers to date.
It sure does.Strubes said:So 2 games made over 17 years ago makes for a franchise? Mmhmm..
The creators of the original game said they wanted it to stay 2-D. And you are in the minority of hating Kid Icarus. 20 years ago, you'd be in the majority, but now, no.Because original 2D which sucked IMO, wouldn't make for a good 3D platformer, IMO.
fhqwhgads said:It sure does.
And you are in the minority of hating Kid Icarus. 20 years ago, you'd be in the majority, but now, no.
Homicidal Cherry53 said:Fr0dus likes it, so he put it on his list. Does whether it's technically a franchise really matter?
My god, who cares whether or not the series has two games or three?
How's having two make it inferior to a franchise?Strubes said:I do.
fhqwhgads said:How's having two make it inferior to a franchise?
You're arguing over how many games a series needs to be a franchise. I'm not sure how that's remotely better.Strubes said:That's not what I'm arguing.
Why?Strubes said:I do.
Yes. Pikmin is a franchise, two games. I don't see what else you would consider it.Strubes said:would you call it a franchise?
Homicidal Cherry53 said:You're arguing over how many games a series needs to be a franchise. I'm not sure how that's remotely better.
And yes, I did jump in. I prefer not having page long, ridiculously pointless arguments spamming up the boards, so I tried to end it.
Why?