fhqwhgads said:Because Rush and Rush Adventure were good?
Nah, because Sonic Adventure 1 and 2 were great, and that's what they're aiming for in this one.
fhqwhgads said:Because Rush and Rush Adventure were good?
Do you think half of the people who made those games are still at Sonic Team, a struggling developer, 10 years after they were made?Strubes said:Nah, because Sonic Adventure 1 and 2 were great, and that's what they're aiming for in this one.![]()
Strubes said:Nah, because Sonic Adventure 1 and 2 were great, and that's what they're aiming for in this one.![]()
Strubes said:Staying optimistic. 8)
That's fine, but all we're asking for is an explanation of why, a little logic behind your opinion. It is indeed an opinion so I'm not trying to prove that you're wrong. I just want to see what formed your opinion.Strubes said:Staying optimistic. 8)
Homicidal Cherry53 said:That's fine, but all we're asking for is an explanation of why, a little logic behind your opinion. It is indeed an opinion so I'm not trying to prove that you're wrong. I just want to see what formed your opinion.
fhqwhgads said:Actually, to drag down some hopes around the Wii version, Dimps is doing the daytime levels. All the nighttime werewolf sections are still being done by Sonic Team. 'Cause the only thing better than having a Sonic beat 'em up is when it's made by Sonic Team.
Time for Metacritic Sonic game scores!
Non-Nintendo games:
Sonic 06 - 43
Sonic Rivals - 64
Sonic Rivals 2 - 60
Nintendo exclusives:
Sonic and the Secret Rings - 69
Sonic Rush - 82
Sonic Rush Adventure - 78
Dimps developed:
Sonic Advance - 87
Sonic Advance 2 - 83
Sonic Advance 3 - 79
Sonic Rush - 82
Sonic Rush Adventure - 78
So a Dimps developed Nintendo exclusive game is usually considered better.
fhqwhgads said:Well, the beginning part was more the drag down hopes part, considering beat 'em up stages shouldn't exist in Sonic games and being done by Sonic Team pretty much guarantees it will be bad.