FTC Proposes 5% Tax On "Consumer Electronics"

MegaDrive20XX

Segatron Genesis... call me the wizard.
As part of a draft plan to "save journalism" (as in, "save newspapers"), the Federal Trade Commission is making a number of proposals to Washington. Among them is a 5% tax on consumer electronics. Hey, game consoles are consumer electronics!

It's already been dubbed the "iPad Tax" by some hipsters, but really, that's a little stupid. Consumer electronics isn't just iPads, or iPhones, or iMacs. It's a Zune, a DS, an Xbox 360, a PS3, a Tivo, a tablet, a laptop and a digital camera as well.

The thinking behind the tax is that it would generate $4 billion annually for the US government, which it could then use to subsidise the continued operation of failing media outlets like newspapers, who have seen their ad revenues drop by over 40% in the past decade.

Putting aside concerns of how this would generate a conflict of interest between the media and the federal government, it's astonishing to think that consumers could be slugged an extra 5% at the register when buying a PlayStation to help save a newspaper.

While 5% doesn't sound like much, on a $500 purchase, that's an extra $25.

Before you grab torches and pitchforks, though, note this isn't law. It's not even the final word from the FTC. It is, as the FTC puts it, "solely for the purposes of discussion". Well, mission accomplished!


FTC Strikes!

Boo!
 
no taxation without PROPER representation.

i disprove of this money grab. when trying to be green by using less paper, why charge people a tax because they arent using paper?
 
Phoenix said:
no taxation without PROPER representation.

i disprove of this money grab. when trying to be green by using less paper, why charge people a tax because they arent using paper?

+1
 
As far as trying to save print publications- it can't be done. They will never reach the success they once had.

Its like radio and TV. Radio used to be king, but TV came along and was clearly better. Radio is still around, but accepts it is inferior to TV.
 
Let me put it very gently, if the newspapers want to survive then they need to change with the times. We no longer use washboards to do our laundry. That idea went out long ago. Newspapers need to adapt to this present era of computers and electronics, and save the trees. We do not need this tax to preserve something that no one is purchasing. What a very dumb idea!
 
You know, I would have sympathy for magazines, because they tend to have information that seems more valid as the days, months or even years pass. But newspapers are dead as far as I am concerned. They have lost their convenience, relevancy and usefulness.

Besides, who wants to bet that this 5% tax to "help save newspapers" will not go to help newspapers? It will be sucked up by some other irrelevant political nonsense.
 
Back
Top