Double post. Whatever. Sue me... but not really.
Dante's Inferno looks incredibly bad. When I first read (in this thread) about its announcement, I was skeptical. Seeing the first 75% of the trailer made me think it might actually work as a really dark, scary, disturbing game ala Eternal Darkness, but then at the end when (who I can only assume is supposed to be) Dante beats to death a Shade/Demon with a cross. What is it supposed to be, an action oriented hack'n'slash? And if so, then drop the use of Dante's Inferno, because its not going to do the book justice. Also, I have read Dante's Inferno, cover to cover, and let me tell you that referring to it as a "Comedy" is a terrible way to represent that book. :lol
Brutal Legend, on the other hand, looked amazing. I am a Jack Black fan, but I'm not a Double Fine fan (I was one of few people who picked up a copy of Psychonauts and traded it in within a month - not because I beat the game, in fact I was probably only a few hours into the main story, but because it was very, very, boring), however I think I'm going to love the union they have formed. I expect to enjoy this game on as many levels as I enjoyed Conker's Bad Fur Day, which is to say, a lot.
The rest of the teasers were just that, nothing more than confirmations of each game's existence. Woo...hoo. When I see trailers like that I always wonder how much time and effort it takes to make them, and then I always think that time and effort would have been better spent actually working on the game's completion. Such was the case with many of the trailers shown.