B
Boom$ickle
Lurker
Re: Mass Effect, first impressions.
Ok, when you actually have the option of duking it out :lol
Ok, when you actually have the option of duking it out :lol
It's much more interesting. The combat sidequests are just repetitive and boring. Throwing in different characters, and dialog would really spice things up.Boom$ickle said:Im gonna say this right now; i havent played either game, but talking it out sounds a lot less interesting than duking it out, as most people would agree. Unless, of course, non fighting sidequests do something other than talking and fighting and is STILL interesting?
Yeah, I saw that. That was by far the best response yet. Sessler completely owned them.Hinesmdc said:Adam Sessler has something to say about the Fox News Mass Effect report..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VBTh1xy5XAI
Fallout 3 may just pwn the hell out of everything. It all depends on Bethesda now.Jaded Deceit said:Anyone think Fallout 3 will topple giants?
Jaded Deceit said:Anyone think Fallout 3 will topple giants?
I played all thee previous games to near death and loved both Fallout 2 and Tactics. Although tactics wasn't that vulgar or X-rated compared to 2.
Fallout, and Mass Effect are in the same genre. I said I expected Mass Effect to be the defining game of the genre (not in the same words, but that general idea). It wasn't this, so I said maybe Dragon Age would do it. Jaded then suggested another game, in the same genre that could do what I expected Mass Effect to do, so we're talking about Fallout 3.Hinesmdc said:*Struggles to find 'Fallout' label on 'Mass Effect' box*
As much as I LOVE a fast paced combat style game... what's this I read about a 'lighter story experience'... [infuriated expression]"So we wanted to be able to give people a much more combat-oriented, lighter-story experience. You're going to go to a kind of casino gaming fight club space station."